long discourse on liberty work

One reason that I raise my eyebrows and roll my eyes with Big Name Trainers is their adherence to rules. It seems to be “do only this” when in reality, horses are individualistic animals which dictate a flexible and adaptable approach to working with them.

When working with students, either riding or with ground training, it is the inflexible ones who seem to end up having the most trouble. It’s hard for them to switch gears and gauge their response by what the horse presents; this seems to be because the student – who has learned never to think for themselves and that there is only “one right way” is trying to apply linear thinking to a situation that needs lateral, problem solving.

This was no more apparent to me then today with the Liberty work with Z in the large dirt arena. I could tell she was excited because she was really stepping out when I lead her out of her pasture. When I took her through the gate, she wasn’t listening to me at all and instead had her eyes on the two Black Beauties (the owners’ Freisian mares were grazing the commons which wraps around this arena). I let her go, and sat down in a chair.

She made her way down to the opposite end of the arena so she could get closer to the mares (who thankfully ignored her). About 15 minutes of grazing the arena (unfortunately, grass has gotten back in with all this rain), she finally started to walk back down to me.

I fed her some carrots, groomed her and then she left again when I squirted some medicine on her back leg wound. At this point, most people would have gotten impatient and just haltered her, however, I had time, so I sat back down for another 10 minutes. When it was clear she wasn’t going to engage again with me, I walked down to her, fed her some carrots, turned and left slowly.

At this point she decided to follow me. What really makes me snicker about a certain Trainer is the idea of that the horse is freely following because of a connection, when in reality she uses carrots. Not hard to get a horse to connect when you have a carrot – yet are they connected to the carrot or to you? In the beginning, trust me, it’s the carrot and not your phenomenal Chi-Power.

Here is where the concept of feel starts to play a huge part in how you work with the liberty horse. Remember, the liberty horse can leave at any time, and this is a huge arena. You have to be aware of the horses’ mood and anticipate their movement before it happens.

Case in point: She followed me on a tackless lead. When I stopped she stopped. Click, treat. We walked on and started a huge circle. At times she thought about disengaging, so before that could happen, I would change my own position to that of driving from behind, walking backwards in front or sending her away…

At one point, I dropped behind her and start leading from behind. This is not a new concept – irregardless of Carolyn Resnick citing it as if she has some sort of exclusivity rights to it. Leading from Behind started long ago with driving concepts, and is also detailed in works by Klaus Hempfling (Zone 3 p. 67 Dancing with Horses) and Linda Tellington-Jones. Resnick just puts the old “Monty-Roberts-Learned-from-the-Wild-Horses” spin on it which seems to appeal to the romantically minded, horse person.

Hempfling's Zone 3 - from behind

Being behind the horse you have two choices: to follow the lead horse as if you are a partner letting the horse be in charge; or to direct the horse in front as if you are “driving”, selecting pace and direction. I find it useful to switch in-between these roles.

The horse partnership is not always with us as leaders and definitely should not always have the horse slavishly following us at all times, esp. not during liberty work which should allow more free will to encourage the horses’ beautiful movement.

Zone 3, Hempfling writes has medium dominance, optimal development of independence, self-responsiblity and confidence. This is why, horses who “don’t wanna” will often react strongly and leave when you are in Zone 3. You are putting a lot of mental pressure upon them and they have the maximum potential to make the decision to leave (as opposed to say, Zone 1).

Zone 3 directing from behind

What is interesting with Behind driving is that horses which are tuned out, abused or have been over-used by humans, will wander off from you and you lose their interest – in their mind you are just being a bully.

While, the strong-willed horse (like Z) will eventually get fed up with you in this position, and will also leave – generally at a higher rate of speed and like today with a good kick from behind (“fuck you!”) as an exclamation point.

Before the horse can disengage, you must time it where you leave the Behind position and go back from leading from Front, sideways companion walking, or sending away.

Leading from Front is Hempflings’ Zone 1 which has greatest dominance, minimal independence on the horses’ part, and where developing the horses’ self-responsibility is not really possible. However, Zone 1 is the position to start in when you have a horse who is really not listening – if you started in Zone 3, the horse would disengage before you could connect.

Hempfling's Zone 1 - in front, facing, walking backwards

The point being is this is a fluid conversation and very much based upon how the horse is feeling that particular day, the horses’ level of training, the horses’ personality or amount of self-will, and your relationship with that horse.

To sum up today’s session with LadyZ: When she did not want to engage, I walked up to her, Said Hello (Carolyn Resnick’s term), fed a carrot and left. When she followed, I went into Zone 1 and she did a Tackless Lead down the arena showing me she was interested in working together and getting more carrots.

At one point when I felt her attention drifting, I went back to Behind (Zone 3) for about 6 horse lengths. Then I would move away, slowing my pace, often stopping or backwards walking to widen the distance between us. She would naturally follow (horses follow what moves away from them – whether that is from curiousity or just “hey! don’t leave me!” I don’t know but it seems universally true with them).

From Zone 1, I would drift to her shoulder (Zone 2) and using the whip behind me with slow taps on the ground keep her momentum (not allowing her to stop). If she was getting too close (her pushy horse behavior), I would fan the whip faster and raise my knees, signaling her to trot off – usually sending her away from me about 4 horse lengths.

What is interesting to note here is that when you send a dominant horse off, they often will react strongly – rearing, bucking, striking out or running off is not uncommon. Be prepared for it.

However, what is very interesting is no matter how strongly they object to being sent away, they come back, wanting to re-connect, almost as strongly as they left! Personally, I like it when there are strong objections to leaving – it generally means they will quickly re-engage.

The further she pulled away the less movement I would use – often just stopping. Then she would turn and walk back to me. Click and Treat.

This entry was posted in Bill Dorrance BD, Carolyn Resnick, Klaus Hempfling KFH, Liberty, Training, Z and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to long discourse on liberty work

  1. Muhammad Rohan Sheikh says:

    Really useful! I see that you have picked ideas from KFH’s book and the way you describe things really make sense. I have heard people say that Klaus’s book are not a how-to to his method. I had a “Look Inside” on his book on Amazon and found his method starts from Leading then Liberty in Picadero & Lunging then Riding and then he describes Advanced Leading and Lunge Work. What do you say about his books? Are they for a beginner like me?

    • horseideology says:

      Hi Rohan –
      I think people who don’t “get” Hempflings books are those who want a recipe (or cookbook) to answer all their questions. His books are not that.

      Americans are too use to clinicians that give A-B-C answers that solve a problem (i.e. my horse runs away). They are definitely slanted from his perspective of being an artist (I believe he was in the fine arts field before horses) and thus deal with a lot of philosophy about horses as symbols.

      I would recommend Dancing with Horses with no problem. What Horses Reveal is much more complicated going into his identification system and is a bit of a harder swallow. When I get his next book, I’ll post my thoughts on that.

      Dancing outlines his leading system (and some people get tired of doing it and want to immediately ride) but I think you would find a lot of benefit of doing the leading – and the book can give the basics for that. I’ve also found it very helpful to then go to his videos (they are free) on Youtube and examine them, referencing his book. Pay close attention to the body language; it is all in that for sure!

  2. Muhammad Rohan Sheikh says:

    Thank you! Your contributions are really helpful! May I know a little about the Riding portion of the book, Dancing with Horses, please?

    • horseideology says:

      Hi Rohan -Dancing has very little riding in it; Other then photos, Hempfling doesn’t cover how-to-ride or anything like that in Dancing. I think it is also why some can be disappointed. The emphasis is definitely on groundwork.

  3. Muhammad Rohan Sheikh says:

    What Horses Reveal is much more complicated. This is what I always hear. I was checking out books and DVDs by Linda Tellington and found she also has a book accompanied by a DVD that tells the archetypes of horses. The older version of the book is here http://www.amazon.com/Getting-Touch-Understand-Influence-Personality/dp/1570760187/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1319457396&sr=8-1#_ a preview of the book is here! She tells how to read head and its individual elements such as eyes, ears muzzle etc. She has classified horse personalities into 21 different archetypes I guess. Have you read this book or seen the DVD?

    • horseideology says:

      Hi Rohan – Yes Linda did do a personality profile of horses based on horse features. Her archetypes are pretty simplistic such as small eyes, close together can lack intelligence, etc…

      I’ve noticed that she has moved away from that in latter books.I suspect that anything about classifying by appearance (even What Horses Reveal) makes people uncomfortable because it can appear to be racist. I don’t believe it is but I can see the slippery slope for people who could use it to as justification just as some used Darwin’s Origin of the Species to justify their political and religious beliefs that people of darker skin were inferior.

      It’s why you have to come to that idea with total honesty and understanding of your own prejudices (for example, some people hate Arabians or Appaloosas and feel that the first are spooky idiots, and the last stupid and stubborn just because of their breed).

    • horseideology says:

      Hi Rohan –
      I don’t know if you saw this on Hempflings’ website? it is rather buried but gives a lot of detail
      http://www.hempfling.com/Example_Grey_Arab_E.pdf

      I wish he had one of these for each of his horse personalities but What Horses Reveal is really not as detailed as this article is – but more of an overview.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s